Australia At War

05.05.12 Australia at war 1h 18m

05.05.12
Ladies and Gentlemen we are at war. We are at war today with forces that are not recognized by the majority of Australians. These forces have come in amoungst us over the past 40 years and embedded themselves in positions of trust and power.
This war we are involved in today is very differerent from any previous war and its forces and combatents are taking a completely different form and method of attack from any previous war.
You can't say civilization don't advance... in every war they kill you in a new way. Will Rogers

This war is an assault on the the very core of human values. The core of human values is that of freedom, the right to choose your own destiny in mind, body and spirit.
The end game of this war is that no man may buy or sell, no man will be able to access employment, all support of any kind, financial or otherwise, will be cut off; Unless that man or woman receives a mark of compliance testifying that he or she is compliant to the Political, Economic and Religious laws of the New World Order.
Today we are in the shadow of Anzac Day. The day that most Australians have kept as a tradition for many years honouring those that went to war to fight for the freedom of Australians.
Every year we have this day to remind us of what could have been. What could have been if the forces of a Dictator Socialist or Communist governments had been victorious over the Allied forces.
So in the shadow of Anzac day, maybe we need to take an hour to contemplate exactly what war is, in order to understand the war we are involved in today.
I once heard it said: "That war is the imposition of wills." In other words it is when the will of one human being is imposed upon the will of another human being. It is the clash between two differing minds and two opposing forces.
When the will of one person is imposed upon another person, this creates a friction, a tension and ultimately a war is begun.
War grows out of the desire of the individual to gain advantage at the expense of his fellow man. Napoleon Hill
The first war in history was recorded in the Bible in:
Rev 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
Rev 12:8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
So, the very first war recorded was also the imposition of wills. We see the will of Satan and his angels was imposed upon the will of Michael and his angels.
The result. Satan and his angels were cast out into the earth. And as further evidence in the scripture points to the fact that this earth is his domain, his dominion. This was evidenced by:
2Co 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not....
Joh 12:31 ..... now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
This may help us understand why, today the human family has a tendency to impose their wills upon other members of the human family, and as a result we see Governments everywhere at war with each other.
War is not new and indeed will continue, until the appointed time.
While I myself want to pay honour and respect those that willingly gave up their life to protect a future generation.
I do this with a mind that understands for the most part they themselves were not fully informed on the real reason for the war.
The military and civilians do not start war, politicians do. And the first casualty of war is the truth.
Many and indeed most followed orders from their government coaxed by an imperialist, colonizing force that had no regard for the lives of humanity as a whole.
I want to make it perfectly clear that I do not respect and I do not honour those that led my father and our fathers into war. My respect is reserved for those who went with an honest belief that they had to go to maintain the idea of freedom.
As the first casualty of war is the truth, we need to understand that the reverse is equally true, that is: the last one to live after war is the lie.
The first casualty of war is the truth.
The last survivor of war is the lie.
I would like to use two examples of recent history to prove my point before we begin to analyse the current war that we are involved in.
The first is the war in iraq. Before the US imperialist army declared war on Saddam Hussein, it was propogated all through the world that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Despite many observers and indeed UN inspectors finding none. Despite this the whole world was told that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and the whole world was in immenent danger of a nuclear holocaust.
clip here WMD lies
Therefore Australia was drawn into a war against a soverign nation upon the basis of a multitude of lies. John Howard and the Liberal government of Australia misled the Australian people and we followed the US into an unjustified immoral war, arguably killing millions of people as a result.
Reason for the war: WMD and an imminent threat.
Sold by: Compliant media.
Result: Millions dead, a legacy of lies, a manipulated public.
The Iraq war was the imposition of the will of G Bush over the will of Saddam Hussein.
Lets look at our next example of Ossama Bin Laden and El Quada.
Osama was the one propogated as being responsible for the 911 attacks on the World Trade Centre. This 5 min clip is a very good summary of the many questions that have never been answered about the 9/11 story.
Corbett clip here. 9/11 a conspiracy theory.
Reason for the war: Terrorism and an imminent threat.
Sold by: Compliant media.
Result: Millions dead, a legacy of lies, a loss of soverign freeodoms, a manipulated public.
By now, I hope that all listening to this podcast have come to realize that the society we live in and the governments that control this society, yes even in Australia are governments that continually lie to the public and there own version of reality is in fact completely based upon lies.
On the other hand those who live upon the basis of truth continue to see the reality of the situation we find ourselves in today, where we are living under a system of lies, deceit, theft, rape, adultery, death and war.
We are at war today against the same forces that my Father went to fight against. Yes my Father was told that he was sent war to fight against the Socialist - Communist forces of Germany and Japan.
Yet today we are being governed by an openly Socialist and covertly Communist and yet plainly a corrupt, and at best Facist cabal of corrupt treasonous thugs.
Yet today this is a very different war. This war is to a large extent a covert war, and yet it as also a open war. This war is being fought with a multitude of battles every day through the corporate media in the minds of every human being.
It was stated many years ago:
“Countless people will hate the New World Order and will die protesting against it.” H.G. Wells, The New World Order (1939)
This war is an mostly covert attack on our lives and lifestyles in Australia. This war is being waged on the back of the earlier examples of Iraq and Afganistan and the propogated war on terrorism.
Yet this war is not about sending military forces into another country and taking another country by force - yet.
This war is an idea. This idea is the idea that our Fathers went to fight against and that idea is the centralized control of the human being. It is about the total control of every aspect of life, body, mind and spirit.
The reason for the war: An Imminent Threat to humanity.
Sold by: A compliant media.
Tools used: Dangerous Global Warming morphing into Climate Change.
Result: Total control of all recources including humanity.
A War against freedom.
As with all other wars it is being sold by a compliant media and corporate interests that have a stake in the process and the outcomes of the war.
In order to start a war there needs to be a problem to attack. the development of the problem is central to all war planning. As we have heard ealier the problem needs to be exagerated to make the threat viable to the public.
I would encourage all of my listeners to review my previous podcast entitled: "When did the Climate Change Propoganda begin?"
Some of the evidence I present begins in the 1960s with President Kennedy requesting a report on how to achieve World Peace without war. It is known as the Iron Mountain report.
There are very interesting terms used and repeated throughout the report. Some of these include:
1. "general condition of peace", "functions of war", "change social structure", "problems of peace", "transition of world peace", replacing the "function of war",
2. "saving the species" (man), "disarmament transition", "social control", "selective population control", "gross population control" and "loss of national sovereignty".
One of the solutions offered was:
Iron Mt report. 1963. "They go on to say that a "gross pollution of the environment" could eventually replace the (propogated threat of) the mass destruction by nuclear weapons, as a "threat to the survival of the species", (meaning humans). In paragraph eight, they go on to say that "....by present indications it will be a generation to a generation and a half before environmental pollution, however severe, will be sufficiently menacing, on a global scale....."
As we travel further along the timeline of history we come to this statement by the Club of Rome.
"The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
Club of Rome. The first global revolution. p75
So we can see from these historical statements, that both have suggested that the idea of the imminenet threat of an environmental holocaust was begun by groups of men planning the future for humanity. A future based on the idea of centralized governence of the whole world nd everything in it.
Who or what is the Club of Rome?
The organization was founded in 1968 by global elite kingpin David Rockefeller and counts amongst its members some of the most influential power brokers on the planet, including current and former Heads of State, UN bureaucrats , high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe.
The Club of Rome’s 1972 publication The Limits To Growth was a Malthusian blueprint on how the human population needed to be reduced in order to prevent an ecological collapse, which in itself was merely a disguised version of the abhorrent eugenicist ideas that were circulating in the early part of the 20th century and which many people think died out with Hitler.
The population bomb scare had coupled with it a drastic reduction of breeding of the human race, which included sterilization programs, forced abortions, (as is carried out in China and other countried today( and the rise of the 'Womens Liberation' movement which had coupled with it 'Planned Parenthood' programms which are really a front for abortion clinics. these programs continue today in all schools in western societies.
The widely discredited population bomb paranoia of the 70's and 80's was gradually replaced by the climate change fearmongering that we see the organization pushing today, which again is merely another regurgitation of the eugenics-obsessed policies of the elite.
Prominent members of the Club of Rome include Al Gore and Maurice Strong, both of whom are intimately involved with privately-owned carbon trading groups like the Chicago Climate Exchange, whose multi-million dollar profits are solely reliant on protecting the credibility of the man-made global warming thesis from skeptics who have challenged its legitimacy in light of the Climategate scandal.
On page 75 of their 1990 publication entitled The First Global Revolution, the organization outlined how they would manufacture ecological scares in order to manipulate the public into accepting the imposition of a dictatorial world government run by them.
It is no accident that the war we are engaged in today, the war that has divided our society is a war that was begun by Globalist Planners, by Social Engineers such as the Club of Rome and many other Globalist minded think tanks, Universities and Corporate entities.
The method of attack used in this war is complex and multifaceted, using many different avenues of propoganda and lies to subjugate the population into a compliant state.
The desired outcomes for the New World Order planners are the very opposite of a Democracy, utilizing force and law to control the populations all under the guise and hoax of saving the earth from climate change.
One obvious method is to manipulate the data, so that the problem (being an imminent catastophe) seems plausible. From the Climategate email scandal it became obvious the propogated war against Carbon Dioxide was just that - an invention of well paid Scientists and a Scientific Dictatorship waiting in the wings.. Some emails are as follows:

From Phil Jones to Warwick Hughes.
"1299. Between July 2004 and Feb 2005. (Exact date not on my copy of the email.) I should warn you that some data we have we are not supposed to (sic) pass on to others. We can pass on the gridded data – which we do. Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it...."
- “Am I the first person to attempt to get the CRU databases in working order?!!” (47)
- “As far as I can see, this renders the (weather) station counts totally meaningless.” (57)
- “COBAR AIRPORT AWS (data from an Australian weather station) cannot start in 1962, it didn’t open until 1993!” (71)
- “What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah — there is no ’supposed,’ I can make it up. So I have : – )” (98)
- “You can’t imagine what this has cost me — to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO (World Meteorological Organization) codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a ‘Master’ database of dubious provenance …” (98)
- “So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option — to match every WMO possible, and turn the rest into new stations … In other words what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad …” (98-9)
- “OH F— THIS. It’s Sunday evening, I’ve worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done, I’m hitting yet another problem that’s based on the hopeless state of our databases.” (241).
- “This whole project is SUCH A MESS …” (266)
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/that-famous-email-explained-and-the-fir...
Corbett - Morano clip here.
Manipulating the media.
It should come as no surprise that in order to win this war the media would need to be the propoganda arm of the Government and the forces that are intent on establishing this New World Order. Lets have a listen to the evidence of the manipulation of the BBC by the Environmental establishments in Britain.
Corbett - Moran BBC clip here.
It follows that if the BBC in England has been manipulated to such an extent it is obvious that the ABC in Australia is also corrupted by the same influences. To those who are awake to these things, it is blatantly obvious that the ABC always gives more weight to the Socialist Green Agenda.
Lets move to some evidence by those in the media and other influential positions that reveal the mindset and intent of those actors in this war.
Stated evidence:
Australian lifestyle is threatened.
1992 Maurice Strong Rio Earth Summit. "It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class ... involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and ‘convenience’ foods, ownership of motor-, numerous electric household appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning ... expansive suburban housing ... are not sustainable."

Oct 2006. The U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works has just issued a majority statement about an environmental magazine advocating Nuremberg-like war crimes trials for folks that question the existence of man-made global warming:
A U.S. based environmental magazine that both former Vice President Al Gore and PBS newsman Bill Moyers, for his October 11th global warming edition of “Moyers on America” titled “Is God Green?” have deemed respectable enough to grant one-on-one interviews to promote their projects, is now advocating Nuremberg-style war crimes trials for skeptics of human caused catastrophic global warming. Grist Magazine’s staff writer David Roberts called for the Nuremberg-style trials for the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/node/8249#ixzz1tJblRegN
Suspend Democracy - fulfilled in Australia today.
15.11.07 Clive Hamilton stated in the "Scary politics of Climate Change" . "This is because the implications of three degrees, let alone four or five, are so horrible that we look to any possible scenario to head it off, including the canvassing of ‘emergency’ responses including the suspension of democratic processes.”
Laws to prosecute climate skeptics advocated.
9.4.10 The Guadian reported. "A campaign to declare the mass destruction of ecosystems an international crime against peace - alongside genocide and crimes against humanity - is being launched in the UK.
The proposal for the United Nations to accept "ecocide" as a fifth "crime against peace", which could be tried at the International Criminal Court (ICC), is the brainchild of British lawyer-turned-campaigner Polly Higgins.
The radical idea would have a profound effect on industries blamed for widespread damage to the environment like fossil fuels, mining, agriculture, chemicals and forestry.
Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute "climate deniers" who distort science and facts to discourage voters and politicians from taking action to tackle global warming and climate change." http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/09/ecocide-crime-genocide...
Climate war to suspend - Democracy. James Lovelock.
We need a more authoritative world. We've become a sort of cheeky, egalitarian world where everyone can have their say. It's all very well, but there are certain circumstances – a war is a typical example – where you can't do that. You've got to have a few people with authority who you trust who are running it. And they should be very accountable too, of course.
But it can't happen in a modern democracy. This is one of the problems. What's the alternative to democracy? There isn't one. But even the best democracies agree that when a major war approaches, democracy must be put on hold for the time being. I have a feeling that climate change may be an issue as severe as a war. It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while.
Climate skeptics not treated equally.
22.6.11 Ian Chubb former head scientist said: "people who disagree with the scientific evidence supporting human-induced global warming do not "deserve equal weight". (Animal Farm. George Orwell. All animals are created equal, but some are created more equal than others).
Tattoo deniers.
6.6.11 Richard Glover SMH said: “Surely it's time for climate-change deniers to have their opinions forcibly tattooed on their bodies. Not necessarily on the forehead..."
Gas deniers.
22.6.11 Jill Singer Herald Sun stated: Really? I'm prepared to keep an open mind and propose another stunt for climate sceptics - put your strong views to the test by exposing yourselves to high concentrations of either carbon dioxide or some other colourless, odourless gas - say, carbon monoxide. You wouldn't see or smell anything. Nor would your anti-science nonsense be heard of again. How very refreshing.
Track skeptics, burn their houses.
Forbes Magazine. 2012 A recent poll by Yale and George Mason Universities shows that most Americans are at or near that point on climate change, with 72% of us seeing a link between extreme weather and our own actions. It’s a link that climate models have long predicted, and with the benefit of hindsight we see that even the earliest models have proven accurate over time.
At the same time, however, the denial machine is ratcheting up its disinformation campaign, and therein lies the problem. Every time someone validates or fine-tunes the science, ten or twelve well-funded and active propagandists pop up to distort it – usually by twisting the attempts at fine-tuning into “proof” that the models are fundamentally useless, and then launching childish attacks on the scientists themselves.
This propaganda has already set us back two decades, during which the costs of dealing with climate change have risen and our chances of curtailing it have diminished. As crop failures mount and costs from damages rise, the denial machine will first continue to blame everything on nature, then it will pretend to be reconsidering its position in light of “new” evidence, and finally it will pretend this was all just an honest mistake – oops, sorry.
Well that doesn’t wash, because the evidence is there right now for anyone who does their homework, and it has been for some time. What’s also there is a very public record of who has been lying to the public and who hasn’t – and it’s time to start using this information to make the liars and shirkers pay.
Let’s take a page from those Tennessee firemen we heard about a few times last year – the ones who stood idly by as houses burned to the ground because their owners had refused to pay a measly $75 fee. We can apply this same logic to climate change.
We know who the active denialists are – not the people who buy the lies, mind you, but the people who create the lies. Let’s start keeping track of them now, and when the famines come, let’s make them pay. Let’s let their houses burn until the innocent are rescued*. Let’s swap their safe land for submerged islands. Let’s force them to bear the cost of rising food prices. They broke the climate. Why should the rest of us have to pay for it?
Climate skeptics must be treated as a sickness.
30.3.12 Professor Kari Norgaard, who is currently appearing at the ‘Planet Under Pressure’ conference in London, has presented a paper in which she argues that “cultural resistance” to accepting the premise that humans are responsible for climate change “must be recognized and treated” as an aberrant sociological behavior.
Therefore from these few examples cited we can see over the last few years there has been a call for those 'skeptic, doubters and questioners' of the establishment and their stated war on Climate Change to be isolated, tattooed, tracked, gassed and not offered the protection of the state.
Rome World Order.
I would like to refer to an excellent article by Dr David Evans and Jo Nova in the wake of the recent ABC program entitled: "I can change your mind." Which featured Senator Nick Minchon and the leader of the Youth Climate
In this article David and Jo lay out the changes that have taken place in society regarding the hierarchichel structure of authority when it comes to science. http://joannenova.com.au/2012/04/the-highest-authority-in-science-is-the...
"How do you find the truth about some disputed point in science? You find the most authoritative source of information. The vital thing that makes science different to a religion is that there are no “Gods” of science. There is no expert who is infallible. The highest authority in science is the measurements and observations. Here is the hierarchy of authority in climate science:
1.Data (empirical evidence)
2.Climate scientists
3.Other scientists
4.Lay people.
or most of the last few centuries, science has been supreme over politics for settling the truth in matters pertaining to the physical world—empirical evidence beats anyone’s say-so.
But the modern political approach is to ignore that top level. To most warmists and the public who “believe in climate change” (as they so misleading say), the hierarchy is:
1.Climate scientists {(Pope, God) My brackets}
2.Other scientists
3.Lay people.
The way the climate scam works is for the like-minded western bureaucracies to be the only employers or funders of climate scientists—which eliminates most of the competition that would otherwise keep them scrupulously honest. While peer review (like the IPCC process) is treated as equivalent to the bible, it’s more like a report of a committee meeting (one that dissenters were not invited to). The government climate scientists use the peer review process to block criticism or alternative theories from being officially heard—as they were caught doing in the Climategate scandal. The mainstream media go to the climate scientists as their ultimate source of authority, and propagate their opinions to the public. Very neat."
The natural question to be asked is: "How is the war progressing?" Following the ABC doco: I can change your mind it seems to me and I hope I am wrong, is that the general fatigue of the people is setting in, and as Alan Jones puts it; Carbon Fatigue.
I think the majority know it is a scam and a hoax and they are right, but feel powerless after 4 years of a Socialist government in bed with the Green army continually pursing this war effort.
However, the real danger is that the general population accept the 'propogated concensus' and think, Oh well its just another tax! Herein is the danger, it is not just another tax. This war is about a complete change of lifestyle as we know it in Australia.
It is about being bought into a state of controlled allocation of all recources that we now take for grahnted. Several words keep ringing in my ears from the documentry and Q&A that followed. They are:
Sacrifice, lifestyle, accept the science, warming, willing to change, policy, legislation to change current lifestyle.
Through it all came the continual covert assertion that we are too comfortable and need to sacrifice for the next generation. Hang on, can't we all sacrifice now if we want to for our children?
Oh but that is not good enough because this sacrifice is not for the children, this sacrifice is for the war effort, it is for the greater good of saving not the freedom of humanity, but mother earth - Gaia - the god of the Ecofacists.
Therefore ladies and gentlemen, we are in a war, not a war where we are fighting for our country, our country has already been sold to the UN Green Socialist Agenda.
We are in a war to fight for our freedoms, a right to choose our own destiny, for as this war continues to progress the freedom of the Individual will be morphed into that of a compliant Drone of the Collective War Machine.
There are only two banners flying in this war:
The banner of light, truth and righteousness, which is led by the Captain of all truth - Yahshua the Messiah. Under this banner are those who pursue the truth, in all its forms, politicall, economic and religious. Under this banner are the people that love life, happiness, goodness, peace and freedom.
Or there is the banner of darkness, under this banner are gathered those who accept and propogate lies, those who desire darkness rather than light, those who desire to bring their fellow man into a slave , controlled state.
Dear friend, fellow Australians, which banner are you under today. Will you join your fellow man to fight in this war?
I will close with this thought.
The Son of God came to this earth to teach us what the meaning of true freedom is. He came to set his people free from the domination and control of their fellow human beings and the Prince of Darkness.
This is the end game.
Rev 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith the Messiah has set us free.
I encourage each of you to know which banner you are under, and to help your fellow man to understand the reality of the war we are fighting today.