- Gods of the United Nations
- Australian thought police target free speech
- Geoengineering - Susanne Posel
- Yahwehs forgotten calender
- Is the Carbon Tax the End of Democracy
- Agenda 21 - Trans Pacific Partnership
- Political Responses to Agenda 21
- Which box do you belong to?
- Understanding Mystery Babylon
- Australian Government Assault on health freedom
- Australia At War
- Bioethics and World Order
- Behold He Cometh with Clouds
- The Ethics of Water Fluoridation
- A Changing Australia
- Carbon Lies of Socialism
- Climate cleansing
- Vaccination zealot calls child protection against innocent mum
- Free Speech
- Port Macquarie Council Agrees to Fluoride Poll
- Property Rights
- The Green Agenda
- The Lima Agreement
- Cancer and the Aluminium connection
- Works cited
- An Australian Story
- Stephen Quintano
- Without Due Care
- The Expendable Project
- Sarah's Last Wish
- Matt & Janett Thomson
- Brian Monk - Defender of private property rights
- CSG Wars - Ruth Armstrong
- Food Security - Bruce Davey
- Wind Turbine Wars
- Eden Health Foods
- Lifestream Health
- Aspartame - Natural Sweetener
- Black Salve - Black Ban
- Dr Rima Laibow
- Dr Veronique Desaulniers
- Eve Hillary
- Farm Wars - GMO Watch
- Food Security
- Our Contributors
- Agenda 21
- Bread of Life
- Illusion of Government
The Lima Agreement
G'day fellow Australians, Do you treasure your freedom and liberty? If you do and you are a citizen of this once great country then this study is for you. As you have just heard from this great aussie song, the Veteren is questioning why he went to war. If you ask any war veteren, they will tell you that war is a waste of people lives, that it achieves nothing.
Even though they were told that they had to go to war to fight for the countries freedom? And yet now many veterens are realizing that the freedoms they were fighting for are rapidly being removed from our country. One of my favourite bible texts is: “And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.” Jn 8:32. Truth is of utmost importance. Therefore in this study we will pursue the truth, in the aspect of Australia's sovereignty, and its relationship to the United Nations. There is war on for your mind. Advertising, radio, tv, sports, entertainment, and even religion, are all demanding our attention today. Are you aware that most wars are planned by powerful worldwide banking and corporate interests. There is an elite group of globalists that have been covertly planning and more recently openely planning for total control of all people in this world.
This information is not hidden for those who are willing to investigate. Shadowy organizations such as: the Trilateral commission, the Council on foreign relations, the Illuminati, the Club of Rome, the Jesuits, the Club of 500, Freemasonry, the IMF, the World Bank, World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, the World Health Organization, the United Nations... these all have a part to play in this plan for total population control. The purpose of this audio is to help you understand that there is a NEW WORLD ORDER in existence, and that this order is not for the good of mankind but for the purposes of a select elite who plan for your bondage and enslavement. HG Wells in his book the New World Ordr said: "... Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." (1939) Understanding the truth about the purpose and intent of these social planners, (Globalists) worlds governments and indeed our Australian government can help us be free from their lies, deceptions and bondage. Being forwarned is to be forarmed, the first step to being enlightened.
The NWO has taken away by stealth Australia's sovereignty. Australia no longer makes decisions in the best interest of its citizens, it now makes decisions according to UN treaties and agreements that it has signed. Let me start with an agreement that was made by Australia and the UN back in 1975 called the Lima Agreement. International treaties in the main are the handy work of the United Nations and have been used by Australian Governments to undermine Australian Sovereignty. The High Court decision on the Franklin Dam issue in Tasmania is a case in point. Used to put in place processes the impact of which the Australian people are completely unaware, and if they were aware, would be totally opposed to, processes that get-around, "The Australian Commonwealth Constitution." In other words, treason. And treason is being committed in the name of International Treaty, or the other names given to them, such as conventions, or in this case declaration, The Lima Declaration. Simply, The Lima Declaration is an agreement to wind down Australian manufacturing and agriculture to import goods from other preferred Countries together with as much primary produce as we can consume. Such as fruit, meat etc.
Originally there was a 30% was a target that has now blown out, current estimates are that 90% of our production capacity has gone, and our jobs with it. There is no mention in the agreement about what will happen to the Australians who lose their jobs, their factories or their farms, it appears they are expendable. How can Government wind down Business Activity? Simply under the guise of establishing a level playing field, they make it uneven. How? Increase taxes, compliance measures, enviromental planning restrictions, interest rates, the cost of employing people; by increasing labor compliance measures, (without the worker gaining any benefit), local council by laws and restrictions, etc. All these things in combination either destroy or increase our ability to manufacture products or produce food. How does The Lima Declaration effect me? Simply we lose our production capacity and our skills to manufacture and produce. More importantly our independance. (This is the Agenda of the New World Order planners) Unemployment increases. Taxes on the employed increases, to pay for the unemployed, increased beurocracy and increased compliance measures. With new shortage of income you are forced to buy cheaper imports, or go without thereby aggravating the spiral of well planned economic transfer. From middle class to economic institutions to third world countries.
Government (unproductive sections) will increase their numbers to cover up the real unemployed statistics or/and change the definition of unemployed; if you work 10 hours a month you will be considered employed. We then have more people in Government at all levels with little to do, other than think up more ways of controlling those who are left to produce what little we don't import, employed thinking up new revenue raising schemes, and raising penalties to ensure their salaries. A perfect example of this is the development of a Deptartment of climate change which employs thousands of people to develop and work out ways to penalize people for breathing. This effort was a CPRS and now on the agenda a Carbon Tax. If the Australian governement did care about its citizens first, it would immediately abolish this department save the country millions of dollars and admit it was a scam. And last but not least, the obscure reason behind The Lima Declaration, Australia becomes a dependent nation, dependent on other nations for it's shoes, it's machinery, it's food, it's survival. In my thinking I would rather that Australia remains a independent nation, able to feed, fuel and clothe itself. We have enough land, water, oil, gas to do this but we are told that our fuel prices are dependant on Singapore? How does this work?
Through the sales propoganda of free trade, our political leaders have removed tariffs and exposed our people to the wage level of the third world and expect our business and agriculture to compete. This is an impossibility and designed to remove our manufacturing and agriculture base, thus removing our independance. Thus typing us to an unelected, world regulatory body, intent on destroying the sovereignty of nations and transfering their economy to others. There is no doubt, that within the grand plan of international control there is no room for self-sufficient nations. Any nation that has all the minerals it needs and can grow all the food and fibre it needs cannot be totally controlled by any international body such as the United Nations the International Monetary Fund or The World Bank. An independent nation (independent in it's production of all the things it needs) cannot be bought into conformity by sanctions, such as Iraq and Iran. What was the real reason for the war in Iraq? There was no WMD! The nations leaders lied to the people and carpet bombed a soveraign nation, why?
Oil can be the only answer! Remember Iraq was independent due to its own wealth. It ownes massive oil reserves and Saddam wanted to remain independent. So what did the NWO do? Destroyed his country and killed him. If Australia cannot make it's own shoes, clothes, and machinery, then others will control us. We can be held hostage at any time. By depending on another nation for any product we expose ourselves to their economic conditions and dictates. That is the real purpose of The Lima Declaration, and that is why those who support the Lima Declaration, including those in influential positions are all traitors. Briefly, How the Treachery in Lima Occurred The second general conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (U.N.I.D.O) met in Lima, Peru from March 12-26, 1975,.
The outcome of that meeting was The Lima Declaration, a blue print for the transfer of technology, tools and jobs to 3rd world or developing nations, leaving the "Developed" nations such as Australia short of technology, tools and jobs. This is now a reality with around 90% of our productive jobs gone and insufficient income from the remaining 10%, to fund the loss of jobs that alone the importing of what we once made right here in Australia with Australian hands, the result yet another 3rd world country in the making. Whitlam, Frazer, Hawke, Keating, Hewson, Howard, Beasley, Rudd, Gillard the Democrats, Greens and the Nationals all subscribe to this type of economic genocide, albeit under different names "North South Dialogue" - "G.A.T.T." - "Internationalism" - "Inter-dependence" - "International Monetary Fund" (I.M.F) "World Bank" or the newly uncovered "New World Order". All different names for the same plan of total control of the world through the money system - control by sick minds, treasonous politicians and bumbling academics and bureaucrats.
The ultimate plan is to return to a pre industrial age utpoia. The New World Order (NWO) is not really new. Its proposal and direction is to return to the Old Order of Masters and Slaves. The middle class within privilaged countries is to be elimated. This is to be carried out through economic disarmament and the destruction of the capability of independance. Independant countries are to become dependant on thrid world countries for food, products and necessities. Likewise our monetory system is to replaced by a World Banking system.
All this is to be administered through a miriad of unelected organizations tied in with the United Nations. The following are some of the recommendations of The Lima Declaration. Resolution 5........Recognising the urgent need to bring about the establishment of a New International Economic Order based on equity, Sovereign equity, Inter-dependence and co-operation as has been expressed in the declaration and program of action on the establishment of a New International Economic Order in order to transform the present structure of economic relations. Comment....In 1975 Australia.(or at least one Australian) agreed to destroy our economy so that it fitted into a "New Economic Order" Resolution 27 -------- Developed Countries such as Australia should expand it's imports from developing countries. Resolution 28 ------ Requires that developing countries increase their Industrial growth by more than the 8% recommended in earlier United Nations meetings and increase their exports by 350% by year 2000. Resolution 35 -------- Developed Countries (Australia) should transfer technical, financial, and capital goods to developing countries to accomplish resolution 28 above. Resolution 59 ------The developed countries should adopt the following measures.
(a) Progressive elimination or reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers, and other obstacles to trade, taking into account the special characteristics of the trade of the developing countries, with a view to improving the international framework for the conduct of world trade. Adherence to the fullest extent possible to the principle of the "standstill" on imports from developing countries and recognition of the need for prior consultation where feasible and appropriate in the event that special circumstances warrant a modification of the "standstill".
(b) Adoption of trade measures designed to ensure increased exports of manufactured and semi-manufactured products including processed agricultural products from the developing to the developed countries
(c) Facilitate development of new and strengthen existing policies, taking into account their economic structure and economic, social and security objectives, which would encourage their industries which are less competitive internationally to move progressively into more viable lines of production or into other sectors of the economy, thus leading to structural adjustments within the developed countries, and redeployment of the productive capacities of such industries to developing countries and promotion of a higher degree of utilization of natural resources and people in the latter
(d) Consideration by the developed countries of their policies with respect to processed and semi-processed forms of raw materials, taking full account of the interests of the developing countries in increasing their capacities and industrial potentials for processing raw materials which they export;
(e) Increased financial contributions to international organizations and to government or credit institutions in the developing countries in order to facilitate the promotion or financing of industrial development. Such contributions must be completely free of any kind of political conditions and should involve no economic conditions other than those normally imposed on borrowers; For further detail get your own copy of The Lima Declaration.
Note.... It would seem that basic economic considerations are ignored to lock the world into a New Economic Order, by which complete control of the world and it's people is planned, through the total control of their economy - their means of existence. The basic economy I refer to is "people". People create the need, the need is then supplied by people's activity. All that is required for economic growth is for people to supply their own market, the proposed New Economic Order, is not about developing 3rd world countries economies for the benefit of their people , it's about developing for the establishment's benefit, our would be masters. The would be masters of The New World Order.
It is an absolute nonsense to say a country needs to export to survive and prosper. Of course one must export an equal amount to that which it imports to balance trade, but the less it imports the less it needs to export to effect the offset. What is required is a locally owned and controlled credit system, the essential ingredient in remaining independent of International finance the exact opposite to the plans of The New World masters. If the fundamentals on which The Lima Declaration is purported to be built were half-correct, our world would have to carry out export/import trade with another world in export-to-survive. This is quite obviously nonsense. The whole world will continue to fall for this treachery while ever the man in the street remains ignorant, under the spell of the banking mafia and that of their cooperative elected officals.
The New Economic Order is mentioned no less than 21 times in The Lima Agreement, that is what The Lima Agreement is all about, locking the new developing countries into "their" economic trap and "their" plans for total world economic control, at the same time reducing developed countries to third world status, clamping the shackles of International debt on every human being, bringing about total world slavery, and the legally enforceable shackles of debt, chained to the slave master, money power. Every Australian must decide between debt controlled slavery or an independent prosperous Australia. Sadly if you propose this to your local member of parliament you will be met with scorn and derision.
The current generation are already pre programmed to accept the sale of our country, our jobs, our farms, our business as a necessity and for our good. More evidence of a New World Order "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995) THAT quotation and many others like them - clearly demonstrate that the words "New World Order" are deadly serious and furthermore, have been in use for decades. They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the Australia as we know it and lessening of the strength of the Australia Constitution. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its 'Nation States' (previously sovereign countries) to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "New World Order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance. “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the NEW WORLD ORDER.” David Rockerfeller.
The above quote helps us understand why there are some major terror events, quickly followed by an immediate set of new laws restricting peoples liberty. There are two obvious cases which come to mind: In Australia the Tasmanian case of Martin Bryant and the Port Arthur shootings. There are many questions surrounding this case and many local investigative journalists have asked some penetrating questions which were never answered fully. Nevertheless what followed? All Australians faced a new set of gun laws! Why because of one mans actions. Of course the sales pitch by the then Howard government was it would reduce crime. This of course has not happened, all persons wanting to commit crime still do and can obtain firearms illegally. In USA the 9/11 attacks on the world trade center is another example. The official government story was that American was under attack by some turban clad desert warriors that had somehow managed to breach all existing security and run some major airliners into the two building. At this point in time over half the committee appointed to investigate the incident do not believe the government story.
There is a massive amount of information available for those who want to investigate. Without going into detail on this incident, what followed very quickly? The invasion of Afganistan, a sovereign nation. The story: Osama did it. Weapons of mass destruction, again as in Iraq. The facts: There was no WMD. Yet this was the reason they said they must fight terrorism? Let me suggest to you, that the real reason they invaded Afganistan was Osama stopped cooperating with the US, once a cooperative agent of the CIA, he chose an independent action. Whenever the powers that be are asked about any of the miriad of question of substance behind the claim that there was WMD etc. The answer is typical: Well the world is a better place without him anyway! As if this justifies the war. Lying is fine, deceit is fine, killing hundreds of thousands is fine. We will do as we choose.
I am not defending Saddam, Osama, Barak, or more recently Gadafi, but think about the lies, more lies and more lies to go after anyone they want. Why is it important? Because they want you as well. This is not above some turban wearing desert warrior threatening your freedoms this is about your government lying to you, and justifying the death of millions of people in the process. "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991 "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do.
I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
"The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind." George Herbert Walker Bush "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992. "We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent." Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950 "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation "The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans. " British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876 "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something.
They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913) "What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil." Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920 "The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers.
The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties." New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922 "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order." Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975) "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988) "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." President George Bush (January 1991)
"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994) "By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations ... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable." Pope John Paul II quoted by Malachi Martin in the book "The Keys of This Blood" "A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order." Brent Scowcroft, George Bush's National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War.
"The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)...Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." President George Bush, September 11, 1990. "The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind." President George Bush in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991. There is sufficient evidence here, this manuscript is available for anyone who would like it. The bible speaks of a Beast power that would coerce or force all men to obey it. The New World Order could be loosely described in three different areas of approach: Political, Economic, and Ecclesiastical or Religious. All three have their part to play.
The above evidence shows that Australia is compliant, open and subservient to the dictates of World Government, over the interests of its people. The worlds population is rapidly dividing into two groups. Those who are compliant to the Socialist system, in all three areas, and those who are not. Which group do you belong to? ... and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. Rev 13:15-18 To be continued...