- Gods of the United Nations
- Australian thought police target free speech
- Geoengineering - Susanne Posel
- Yahwehs forgotten calender
- Is the Carbon Tax the End of Democracy
- Agenda 21 - Trans Pacific Partnership
- Political Responses to Agenda 21
- Which box do you belong to?
- Understanding Mystery Babylon
- Australian Government Assault on health freedom
- Australia At War
- Bioethics and World Order
- Behold He Cometh with Clouds
- The Ethics of Water Fluoridation
- A Changing Australia
- Carbon Lies of Socialism
- Climate cleansing
- Vaccination zealot calls child protection against innocent mum
- Free Speech
- Port Macquarie Council Agrees to Fluoride Poll
- Property Rights
- The Green Agenda
- The Lima Agreement
- Cancer and the Aluminium connection
- Works cited
- An Australian Story
- Stephen Quintano
- Without Due Care
- The Expendable Project
- Sarah's Last Wish
- Matt & Janett Thomson
- Brian Monk - Defender of private property rights
- CSG Wars - Ruth Armstrong
- Food Security - Bruce Davey
- Wind Turbine Wars
- Eden Health Foods
- Lifestream Health
- Aspartame - Natural Sweetener
- Black Salve - Black Ban
- Dr Rima Laibow
- Dr Veronique Desaulniers
- Eve Hillary
- Farm Wars - GMO Watch
- Food Security
- Our Contributors
- Agenda 21
- Bread of Life
- Illusion of Government
Kaos vs Design 1
Kaos vs Design - Evolution or Creation 1
Kaos part 1.
This is a subject of great interest. How do we exist? Did we and all life, animals, plants, cells, planets, stars, the sun, the moon indeed all life whether it be sea, rivers, fish, microbes, air CO2, oxygen and all life in its various forms, how and why does it exists.
This is the question that has been one of debate for thousands of years and depending on how you understand this question, is intricately linked to your outlook on life and the indeed the future. So the purpose of this study is to make a comparison of essentially two streams of thought. Evolution and Creation.
Now connected with these two streams of thought are many different doctrines and I do not propose to nor is it possible to cover all the different angles and aspects of each position. However, I intend to compare the principles behind each position and I want to ask you the question where you stand on this subject.
It is my hope that this thought paper may help you think about the wider ramifications of where you and indeed society stands upon this subject, and accordingly the effect of that position in shaping society.
The two basic streams of thought are:
Evolution: That life evolved from nothing. Out of nothing come something, then something evolved into something else, and something else evolved into, that and that evolved into me. There is no design, everything just happened. Life as we know it is just happening there is no plan, we are evolving. There is no plan for the future. Everything is happenstance! The majority of science and scientists today rest on this position.
Creation: That all life was created by a Divine person – Yahweh, and that every form of life is part of that Creation. That Creation is designed and every part of creation complements the other. There is an interdependence between all components of creation, purposely designed to sustain each and every other part. There is not only an intelligent design in creation but there is also an intelligent design for the future.
As we go along we will see that these two positions are diametrically opposed to one another, and the proponents of these two positions take completely different world views including views of the nature of man and the future.
Sir Arthur Keith (evolution and ethics) wrote “The conclusion I have come to is this: the law of Christ is incompatible with the law of evolution, nay, the two laws are at war with each other. He also wrote; “Evolution is unproved and improvable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” (To the scientist)
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science - falsely so called: (1 Timothy 6:20)
For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; (Acts 17:23-25)
Ignorance is connected with worshipping an unknown god.
Evolution is not science.
The first thing that we need to consider is that the theory of Evolution is not science. Even though those who promote Evolution always refer to it as science. This of course is part of the GMP, steering society into a climate of trusting the experts. As Dr James Tracy put it: 'A deference to experts.' is a very important part of the building of this Technocracy.
What is science?
The Oxford English Dictionary says that scientific method is: "a method or procedure that has characterised natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses via predictions which can be derived from them.
True science develops a hypotheses then that hypotheses must be tested by measurement and observation.
We will ask the following questions regarding the theory of evolution.
Q. Who developed the Hypotheses of evolution? Was that someone Someone opposed to the Bible?
Q. Observation. Who was there? If there was nothing, how can anyone be a witness?
Q. How can anyone measure nothing?
Q. How can anyone test nothing? When there is nothing to test?
Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research stated: “Evolution is a fairy tail for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.”
Dr. T.N. Tahmisian of the Atomic Energy Commission said, “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great conmen and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever.
In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.”
It is upon this subject that I came to realise many years ago that modern 'science' or as I mentioned before “Science falsely so called,' has been manoeuvred into a box of thinking. Never has this been more apparent than in the climate change debate. It has shown us that State sanctioned science is co opted and corrupted, and I do not trust them.
BUT. I am happy to research and observe true science that is honest and genuine – Fairdinkum.
Evolution is a matter of faith. Faith in a theory that is not proven. In other words you must trust the men propagating the story, you must trust that their story is true. Therefore like the climate change movement, it is not science but is a matter of faith.
There is no record of events.
No one was there.
There is nothing to record.
Cannot be termed science.
Likewise, to accept Creation is a matter of faith, BUT, that faith can be proven as we have a written record of events that can be placed against fossils, rock formations, layered mountains; etc, to be confirmed. We also have an abundance of evidence to prove that that record is correct. So there are many different points of authentication that we can refer to that confirm our trust and faith in the record.
Charles Darwin is held in the highest esteem by most people who hold to the evolutionary theory. If you ask anyone about why they believe in evolution they will respond in someway with a reference to Darwin. Indeed he is the modern day proponent to this doctrine. His book 'Origin of species' is often referred to as the standard by which all evolutionary science emulates.
“Darwin admitted that millions of ‘missing links’, transitional life forms, would have to be discovered in the fossil record to prove the accuracy of his theory that all species had gradually evolved by change mutation into new species. Unfortunately for his theory, despite hundreds of millions spent on searching for fossils worldwide for more than a century, the scientists have failed to locate a single missing link out of the millions that must exists if their theory of evolution is to be vindicated.” (Grant R. Jeffery, The Signature of God).
“In the years after Darwin, his advocates hoped to find predictable progressions. In general, these have not been found – yet the optimism has died hard, and some pure fantasy has crept into the textbooks.” (David M. Raup, “Evolution and the Fossil Record”, Science, Vol. 213, July 17, 1981, p. 289).
The big bang theory.
Is another theory that has been put forth as being a scientific truth to support evolution. This is the theory that I will focus on although there is a multitude of others, this one is the most prominent, the strongest according to their own publications.
The key point to accepting evolution is that you must trust the experts. This the beginning and the hinge point of the modern Technocracy. A Technocracy is the measurement of all things, amd the only ones who can correctly understand measurement are Scientists or Experts. So dealing with measurement the Worldly Scholars have said that we have the answer and you must trust us.
The originators—George Lemaitre, of Belgium, struck on the basic idea in 1927; and George Gamow, R.A. Alpher, and R. Herman devised the basic Big Bang model in 1948. At first, the theory was not widely accepted by astrophysicists. It was not the only cosmological theory. Sir Fred Hoyle had a rival theory, called the Steady State theory, in which he claimed that new material must constantly be made in the universe to fill in the gaps, as the existing material expands. It was Hoyle who originally coined the term Big Bang, in a radio broadcast in 1949. He intended the term to be an insult, but it is now widely used by supporters of the theory.
According to the Big Bang theory, all matter and all space was originally part of an infinitesimally small point called the Singularity. The theory says nothing about where that singularity came from. It is assumed to have come about by a random quantum event.
This is what Brad Lemley said about quantum events.
“To the average person it might seem obvious that nothing can happen in nothing. But to a quantum physicist, nothing is, in fact, something.”
If this seems a somewhat unusual statement, try this next statement.
“Quantum theory also holds that a vacuum, like atoms, is subject to quantum uncertainties. This means that things can materialise out of the vacuum, although they tend to vanish back into it quickly….this phenomenon has never been observed directly”…
If I might be so bold as to translate this into English, he seems to be saying “things appear from nothing and then disappear back into nothing. And nobody has ever seen any of that happen!”
The astronomer Heather Cowper put it this way, in a children’s book called The Big Bang.
“Our Universe probably came into existence not only from nothing, but from nowhere.”
This does not appear like a scientific argument, but more like a doctrine of religious faith. “In the beginning, there was nothing. And that nothing exploded”.
Q. How can something explode into everything from nothingness?
Summary of natural selection
Natural selection is a key component of evolution. It basically states that the fittest of a species survives and therefore the evolution of life means that nature improves and increases because of this natural tendency to get better. So in the case of wildlife we can easily see by observation that the sick animal will be the first to be taken by a predator etc. Therefore the strong animal that can escape entrapment survives while the maimed die.
The question is:
Is man to be compared with an animal?
Is man on an equality with animals?
Is a tree = to a man, is a frog = to a man?
These questions are important, because an Evolutionist accepts that there is no God and therefore cannot accept that man was placed over creation. For an evolutionist everything is random, everything is happen-stance.
“Natural selection is the gradual, non-random, process by which biological traits become either more or less common in a population as a function of differential reproduction of their bearers. It is a key mechanism of evolution. The term "natural selection" was popularised by Charles Darwin who intended it to be compared with artificial selection, what we now call selective breeding.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection
You will notice the term 'selective breeding' and this term and concept is intimately connected to Evolution. Most evolutionist believe in natural selection. And this is where the link fits in to modern day science. It goes like this; If you believe in evolution you believe in Charles Darwin, if you believe in Charles Darwin you believe in selective breeding, if you believe in selective breeding you believe in Eugenics.
If you believe in Eugenics you believe in the elimination of people that don't deserve to live because they are inferior, sick, maimed, diseased, genetically impaired.
And further because there is no God, no Creator, there is no conscience about these things. For example where does humanity get the concept that 'Thou shalt not kill'? The Bible. Without the bible, if we just accepted natural selection, we should be all be Eugenicist. Because morals come from God, not man.
Darwin was one of the first pioneers of Eugenics. Eugenics is the quack science that teaches race superiority within certain bloodlines. Darwin practised a systematic program of measurement of humanity body parts and a systematic study of each organ. From this study he concluded that 'his race' ; The British Gentry Elite were the blessed bloodlines.
“Eugenics is the "applied science or the bio-social movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at improving the genetic composition of a population", usually a human population. The origins of the concept of eugenics began with certain interpretations of Mendelian inheritance, and the theories of August Weismann.
Sir Francis Galton, cousin of Charles Darwin, invented the term eugenics in 1883 and set down many of his observations and conclusions in a book, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. Eugenics was widely popular in the early decades of the 20th century. The First International Congress of Eugenics in 1912 was supported by many prominent persons, including: its president Leonard Darwin, the son of Charles Darwin; honorary vice-president Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty and future Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; Auguste Forel, famous Swiss pathologist; Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone; among others”.
Lets take a look at Charles Darwins ideas about natural selection and see how they settle in your mind? Are you comfortable about these thoughts and application to you and to society in general? After all this man is the Great Grandfather of Evolution Theory and Science?
“At the present day civilised nations are everywhere supplanting barbarous nations, excepting where the climate opposes a deadly barrier; and they succeed mainly, though not exclusively, through their arts, which are the products of the intellect. It is, therefore, highly probable that with mankind the intellectual faculties have been mainly and gradually perfected through natural selection; and this conclusion is sufficient for our purpose...
With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment.
There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”
We must therefore bear the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely that the weaker and inferior members of society do not marry so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased by the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage, though this is more to be hoped for than expected. “ http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-descent-of-man/chap...
The results of this inbreeding program.
Hence as a result his family intermarried, the results being deformed children.
His work was followed by the Eugenics society, the Galton Institute which has morphed today into Family Planning Institutes worldwide. These family planning institutes are all funded by non- profit tax exempt foundations which pour millions of dollars every year into the propogation of a eugenics agenda. If you do not think there is a depopulation agenda underway explain this.
Why is male sperm count down +50% in the last 50 years due to the rise in Corporate sponsored chemicalisation food products.
Why do Climate Alarmist always talk about overpopulation as a basis for 'doing something?
Why do Globalists state their objectives of 1 billion people maximum?
How is that these Globalists are in positions of power and influence?
Some quotations from evolutionists.
"Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" Charles Darwin
"I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them …. I will lay it on the line-there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument." Dr Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History, author of "Evolution"
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution" Renowned evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould
"The earliest and most primitive members of every order already have the basic ordinal characters, and in no case is an approximately continuous series from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so sharp and the gap so large that the origin of the order is speculative and much disputed" Paleontologist George Gaylord
The shaping of society.
There have been forces at work for many years to shape society into a communist, socialist state. Many of those shapers, whom I call 'Engineers or Planners' have had a profound effect on how society today views itself and the future direction for society. Most if not all are connected with the Evolution – Eugenics Agenda.
One of those engineers whose family was closely connected to Charles Darwins family is the Huxley family.
It was Aldous Huxley who said:
Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. Aldous Huxley.
The brotherhood of men does not imply their equality. Families have their fools and their men of genius, their black sheep and their saints, their worldly successes and their worldly failures. A man should treat his brothers lovingly and with justice, according to the deserts of each. But the deserts of every brother are not the same. Aldous Huxley.
A democracy which makes or even effectively prepares for modern, scientific war must necessarily cease to be democratic. No country can be really well prepared for modern war unless it is governed by a tyrant, at the head of a highly trained and perfectly obedient bureaucracy. Aldous Huxley.
The key to shaping a Communist Socialist state is understanding the base of their thinking. Evolution is the base of science today. Therefore many scientists don't realise that they are connected intimately with the propagation of eugenics by accepting the theory of evolution.
If it cannot be proven it is not science, and yet in every school it is taught, in every University, in every nature publication. It is the religion of a godless state. Evolution is the direct assault upon the Creator and everything that has has taught. If you take away the Creator man has no moral guide, no understanding of the past and no guide for the future, EXCEPT what the social scientists will tell you.
This is how society is being shaped. It is being shaped by science falsely so called. It is being shaped by forces of darkness working through men who declare 'there is no god', but their reason, their mind is to be the standard for all men. These are the philosophers that Paul instructed Timothy to avoid.
Evolution is false science. I reject it, and all its associated teachings including eugenics and natural selection.